The Three Key Competencies that Optimize Data Security Orchestration
One of
the principal benefits of a modern data-centric security fabric is
being able to automatically apply security controls to the data itself and
drive policy-compliant data handling behavior by privileged
users. But we all know that detecting a security incident is just
the first part of the process. If your organization’s response to anomalous
behavior is inefficient, the automated detection competency that you have
painstakingly built devalues quickly. In this post, we’ll examine why manual
change management is not sustainable in a world of automated incident
detection, and why the march to automated security orchestration and
event response has been slow. We’ll also explain the three essential
functionalities an automated data security orchestration solution must provide
to ensure optimized threat remediation.
The evolution
from change management to security orchestration for incident remediation
Change
management has been an elusive goal for data security programs from the outset,
as organizations struggle to reconcile their change management processes with
the actual events taking place in their data repositories. The challenge most
organizations face when optimizing their orchestration process is how to
eliminate bottlenecks in event-level workflow communications. Linking data with
decision processes, communicating, and orchestrating security controls
end-to-end to take remediation actions has historically been a manual process.
Another challenge has been the constant struggle organizations have with
database activity monitoring and logging tools that, more often than not, have
overwhelmed SOCs with raw and low-value data instead of analytically processed
information that would provide valuable guidance on how to respond to anomalous
events. Considering the sheer size of today’s data landscape, and that event
remediation is an important governance process where improper changes can have
serious security and operational impacts, manual processes are no longer
sustainable.
To ensure
that automated, optimized security incident detection becomes the automated
security incident response and remediation process you need, your solution must
enable these three competencies:
Gain critical
access to data flows from key activity domains
To perform
the analysis and interpretation required to automate preventative action and
rapid remediation responses to security threats, your solution must enable
security architects, security team leads, and CISOs to gain access to data
flows from key activity domains (e.g., Sessions/Logins, Exceptions/Errors or
Policy Violations) from an unlimited number of sources and make them visible in
a single pane of glass so you can see them through a single dashboard. The
solution must also enable security teams to run sophisticated, unsupervised
analytics engines automatically to respond to predefined events, such as
locking out a user when the system identifies a suspicious login.
Create higher
value data that results in more intelligent responses
Your
automated security event remediation solution should enable your security teams
to perform an analysis of enriched contextual data to detect behavioral
anomalies like account abuse, code injection, insider
threat, etc., and automate remediation responses to prevent future
security events.
The
solution must provide the capacity for users to join related information such
as metadata, vulnerability assessment, discovery and classification, and
entitlements from any number of sources to substantially boost the context and
improve the value of all data. This results in more efficient automation of
data interpretation and processes as well as accelerated communication and
faster remediation actions.
Eliminate slow
manual processes
The
solution should offer actionable threat intelligence through customized and
pre-built event-level workflows and User and
Entity Behavior Analytics engines (UEBAs) that transform raw
activity data into valuable information via unsupervised learning. This
intelligence should inform the process and eliminate the need for manual
routing and entitlement review processes, report sign-off, trusted connections
validation, and change management processes to improve response times and
overall communication among stakeholders. Another important function is the
ability to optimize security operations integration by eliminating alert storms
and high volumes of false positives and improving security visibility. Ideally,
your solution will feature out-of-the-box playbooks to automatically manage
sensitive data alerts, import assets, run or disable scans, and discover when
new data sources are added to the repository. These playbooks should integrate
with SOAR systems to prevent security events before they occur and mitigate the
damage a prospective breach could cause.
How Imperva Data
Security Fabric can help
As we have
seen here, it takes automation from end to end to optimize a security solution.
Built-in Imperva Data
Security Fabric incident response workflow processes turn days
of incident management work into minutes. These include reporting signs offs,
entitlement review, and change request reconciliation which direct incident
management actions to stakeholders, ensuring nothing is missed. Integrations
with other mission-critical security and management tools enable automated
orchestration between systems. For example, a critical incident flagged by
Imperva analytics could trigger a playbook that automatically deactivates the
user account in the database, assigning a critical incident ticket to a
security analyst in their SOC workflow manager for investigation.
Gain control over security event management
Using data risk
analytics, you get visibility into
a broad range of events from accidental exposures to persistent
attacks by an evasive exploit, so you can quickly evaluate and know what’s
happening before it’s too late.
·
Faster
problem resolution times
·
Categorize
and prioritize by real risks, rather than anomalies
·
Spot
bad actors before they cause damage
·
Correct
non-compliance issues before audit failures
·
Get
clear summaries that explain complex issues in plain language
·
Eliminate
false positives, and enable SOC teams to focus on the critical issues
A.L.
Comments
Post a Comment